Pricing

Priced as a partnership, not a licence key

Khepee is sold to licensed institutions under a service agreement, and the commercials depend on your portfolio, your products and how much of the operation we run. This page explains the model rather than pretending a single number would be honest.

There is no public price list, and here is why

Khepee is pre-launch and has not yet run a production portfolio. Publishing a per-loan or per-seat figure now would be a guess dressed as a commitment, and we would end up either overcharging early partners or renegotiating within a year. Launch partners get transparent, cost-based pricing agreed in writing, with the calculation shown rather than asserted. When we have real operating data, we will publish real numbers.

The model

Three components, all negotiable

  • Implementation

    A one-off fee covering configuration, vendor integration, officer training and pilot support. Scoped to your products, not a standard package.

  • Platform subscription

    A recurring fee for hosting, support, maintenance and regulatory updates. Scaled to your portfolio rather than a flat enterprise figure.

  • Usage

    A component tied to volume — applications processed or loans serviced — so a small pilot costs like a small pilot.

Scope

What the fee covers, and what it does not

Not included

  • Third-party KYC provider fees
  • SMS and notification delivery costs
  • Payment gateway or rail charges
  • Your own legal and compliance review
  • Hardware for your officers
  • Custom features outside the agreed roadmap

Included

  • The full platform: app, console, admin panel and API
  • Hosting, monitoring and backups
  • Regulatory constant updates when NRB revises a rule
  • Officer training and compliance documentation
  • A named engineering contact
  • Complete structured data export, at any time

Launch partners

Better terms for going first, and we will say why

The first partners take real risk: an unproven platform, features still being built, and the work of shaping a roadmap. That is worth something, and we would rather price it honestly than dress a discount up as a limited offer.

  • Preferential commercial terms, fixed for a defined period
  • Direct influence over what gets built next
  • Substantially more of our engineering attention than a later cohort
  • In exchange: patience with a platform that is still maturing

Exit

Leaving will not be made expensive

Lock-in through data hostage-taking is common in this category and we will not do it. Exit terms are in the agreement, and they are not punitive.

  • Complete structured export of borrowers, applications, schedules and the audit trail
  • Transition assistance during the notice period
  • No per-record charge for your own data
  • We would rather be chosen each year than contractually retained

Comparison

The honest alternative is building it yourself

The relevant comparison is not against another vendor — there are few in this market. It is against an in-house build, and that comparison should include the parts institutions routinely forget.

  • Engineering salaries for a team that must be retained for years, not months
  • The compliance work: limits, audit trail, purpose binding, retention
  • Mobile development and app store maintenance for two platforms
  • Security review, penetration testing and remediation
  • Ongoing regulatory change, indefinitely

Coming soon

Ask for a written proposal

Tell us your portfolio size and product mix, and we will show you the calculation rather than just the number.